by Shannon Allen
The
United States Department of Agriculture’s
(“USDA’s”) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(“APHIS”) issued proposed changes to
regulations regarding facilities that
receive livestock moved in interstate commerce. This proposed rule includes several amendments to the conditions under
which livestock may move to such facilities without official identification. The
goal is to update rules specifically regulating livestock marketing facilities in order to further aid in ensuring animal disease traceability of livestock transported
in interstate commerce to such
facilities.
9 CFR
subchapter B focuses on Cooperative
State-Federal programs for the control or eradication of disease of livestock;
subchapter C addresses interstate
movement of livestock to prevent the dissemination of disease of livestock in
the United States (“The Regulations”); and part 71 states that the APHIS
can approve a livestock facility to
accept livestock transported interstate and facility approval requires the
execution of an agreement with APHIS.
The APHIS believes the agreement in § 71.20 is antiquated
because it contains provisions that were
necessary when diseases of livestock were more prevalent in the United States.
Thus, APHIS proposes the following changes to the regulations, including, but
not limited to the following (by topic):
Approved
Livestock Marketing Facilities - Replacing all
references to “livestock facilities” with “livestock marketing facilities.” The
the term “livestock
marketing facility” describes different facilities (e.g.
stockyards, auction barns, buying stations, etc.). “Livestock
marketing facility” helps differentiate such facilities from other
locations (e.g. slaughtering facilities, quarantine lots, feed lots, dairies,
farms, ranches, etc.).
Proposed
Revisions to Part 71 - Requiring all livestock marketing
facilities, regardless of whether they
have sought APHIS approval to allow APHIS to conduct operations in such
facilities in order to detect, control, and eradicate disease of livestock, and
maintain a record of the receipt, distribution, and application of all official
identification devices and USDA-approved backtags at the facility. The proposal would also remove the
requirement that an accredited
veterinarian be physically present at all times on sale days because it
causes logistical problems . . . at some
facilities.
Proposed
Revisions to Part 86 - Clarifying that the exemption “no more than
one” applies only to cattle and bison,
transported interstate from their farm of
origin to an approved livestock marketing facility. Also, clarifying that the exemption “directly
to an approved livestock marketing facility” applies only to cattle and bison moved interstate from their
farm of origin to an approved livestock marketing facility. If cattle or bison commingle with animals from different premises, there
will be a greater risk of disease
introduction and spread of disease of livestock.
Application
of USDA-Approved
Backtags - Requesting public comment regarding
specifying a location for backtags.
APHIS
asserts this proposed rule will not cause any significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
However, without current data required for a comprehensive analysis of the effects of this proposed rule on small
entities, APHIS seeks comment on potential
effects. Specifically, APHIS seeks
input on determining the number and kind
of small entities that may incur benefits or costs from the implementation of
this proposed rule.
Interested
parties are invited to submit comments on or before March 3, 2015, by either of
the following methods:
- Online: Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2014-0018; OR
- By Mail (Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery): Send your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2014-0018, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238.
No comments:
Post a Comment