On July 16,
2013, the House overwhelmingly passed, H.R. 2576, which would modify
requirements regarding the availability of pipeline safety standards. On June 28, 2013, subcommittee Chairman Denham, Full Committee Chairman
Shuster, subcommittee Ranking
Member Brown, and Ranking
Member Rahall, of
the House Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure, introduced H.R.
2576. The
bill would address issues related to Section 24 of the Pipeline
Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 (“the Act”). The Act contains
a requirement that all industry “technological standards” which
are “incorporated by reference in guidelines and regulation” must
be made accessible for no cost “on the internet.”
H.R. 2576
expressly:
- extends the deadline for making standards available from one to three years so industry and the Pipeline and the Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) can properly implement the mandate,
- deletes the term “guidance” from the provision to lessen the number of PHMSA documents that this provision applies too, and
- deletes the term “on an internet Web site,” which will protect copyright and intellectual property from being released to the public on the internet, and allow more flexibility for access to incorporated documents.
The Committee explained that the
purpose of H.R. 2576 is to “protect property rights while allowing for
more flexibility in making documents transparent.” The Committee
also expressed Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) concerns regarding
1) “intellectual property rights,” 2) allowing “oversees
competitors free access to valuable intellectual property,” and 3) the
Act harming the capability of some SDOs to “continue to develop
standards if they are unable to bring in revenue to offset the cost of
development.”
On June 1, 2012,
the Section of
Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice (“the Section”), submitted comments, to the Office
of Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, concerning “the practice of incorporation by
reference in agency regulations.” In
the Comments, the Section recognized that SDOs charge industry for crafting
technical industry standards and that the government routinely incorporates by
reference (“IBR”) these standards into regulations. The Comments emphasized
that “ready access” to IBR standards “is necessary for citizens to know what their
government is doing and to hold the government accountable for serving – or not
serving – the public interest.” Transparency
concerning IBR standards, the Section urged, is of special importance when the
IBR standards are crafted by “private
organizations rather than governmental agencies” (e.g. when American
Petroleum Institute standards are incorporated by reference
in pipeline safety rules).
The Section also
suggested that “the
long-term effects of requiring internet access to IBR standards” would not be as injurious to SDOs as they
anticipate. The Section
argued that 1) posting IBR standards online “would
not prevent SDOs from enforcing their copyrights,” 2)“users who want an [IBR] standard in hard copy could
still be required to buy it from the SDO,” and 3) “most users of incorporated
standards will continue to buy them even if they are available in read-only
form online . . .” because
for many industries “there is
simply no substitute for having . . . paper copies that can be highlighted,
tabbed, carried around and referred to anywhere, anytime.”
No comments:
Post a Comment