by Lynn White
On July 9, 2013, the House Committee
on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust
Law held a hearing on H.R.
2122 (S.
1029), the Regulatory Accountability Act of
2013. The bill would update the
Administrative Procedures Act to reform how agencies promulgate
regulations.
During the 109th
Congress, the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law initiated the
Administrative Law Process and Procedure Project for the 21st Century which
included a comprehensive study of administrative law and process and made
recommendations for improvement. H.R.
2122 is an outgrowth of the recommendations the Subcommittee published in the Interim Report on the Administrative Law
Process and Procedure Project for the 21st Century.
In particular, H.R. 2122
codifies some of the core requirements of Executive Orders (EOs) 12866 and
13563, which establish guidelines for federal agency rulemaking. Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) stated that H.R. 2122 takes long established best practices
from EOs 12866/13563 and makes them legally binding. This includes requiring cost benefit analysis
and greater input from the regulated community early in the rulemaking process
for high-impact regulations. Chairman
Goodlatte stressed the need to modernize the Administrative Procedures Act so
that it reflects that current state of rulemaking.
Some opponents of the
legislation suggest that it will slow down the rulemaking process. Proponents of the bill state that it “will improve the
accountability and integrity of the rulemaking process.”
No comments:
Post a Comment